Clinical evaluation of a temporary fecal containment device for non-surgical fecal diversion in perineal burns.

نویسندگان

  • Metin Kement
  • Hakan Ahmet Acar
  • Ilhami Soykan Barlas
  • Nihat Aksakal
  • Cem Gezen
  • Uygar Düzci
  • Mustafa Oncel
چکیده

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical results of a temporary fecal containment device (Flexi-Seal® FMS) in our burn center. METHODS All patients in whom temporary fecal containment devices were applied for perineal burns between August 2008 and August 2009 in our institution were reviewed. Demographics, etiology of burns, total body surface area (TBSA) burned, intensive care unit (ICU) need, early mortality, and post-application data were obtained from a prospectively designed database. In addition, some variables were investigated as potential risks factors for fecal leakage. RESULTS The mean age of patients (n=15) was 43.1±22.1 years, and 66.7% of the patients were male. The mean %TBSA burned was 40.7±16.6. Fecal leakage was seen in 6 patients. Local infection in the perineum was observed in 6 patients, including 4 of the 6 patients with fecal leakage. The mortality rate was 33% (5 deaths). All exitus patients had 50% or more TBSA burned. Electrical burn injury was found as a significant risk factor for fecal leakage in surviving patients (p<0.05). Autologous split-thickness grafting was performed in 8 patients without complication. The mean duration of catheterization was 22.5±5.7 days. Except for superficial mucosal erosion in the distal rectum in 2 cases, no complication was observed. The mean hospitalization time was 46.7±12.7 days. CONCLUSION If the safety of these devices is proven in further prospective, high-volume studies, they may reduce the necessity of diverting stoma operation in burn patients.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Laparoscopy-assisted loop ileostomy: an acceptable option for temporary fecal diversion after anorectal surgery.

PURPOSE Temporary fecal diversion may be desired after many anorectal procedures. The aim of this study was to describe a technique for laparoscopy-assisted creation of a loop ileostomy in patients undergoing anorectal and perineal surgery and to relate short-term outcomes. METHODS A retrospective review of the medical records of 53 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopy-assisted crea...

متن کامل

Temporary Fecal Diversion in the Management of Colorectal and Perianal Crohn's Disease

Aim. To evaluate the results of temporary fecal diversion in colorectal and perianal Crohn's disease. Method. We retrospectively identified 29 consecutive patients (14 females, 15 males; median age: 30.0 years, range: 18-76) undergoing temporary fecal diversion for colorectal (n = 14), ileal (n = 4), and/or perianal Crohn's disease (n = 22). Follow-up was in median 33.0 (3-103) months. Response...

متن کامل

AN EASY SOLUTION FOR THE DIVERTING LOOP COLOSTOMY: OUR TECHNIQUE

 ABSTRACT Background: The loop colostomy is one of the most popular techniques used as a protective maneuver for a distal anastomosis and/or temporary fecal diversion. We are introducing the use of a full thickness skin bridge under the large bowel instead of a glass rod which alleviates problems such as protrusion of the large bowel, retraction of the bowel into the abdomen after removing the ...

متن کامل

Fecal diversion in management of large infected perianal lesions.

PURPOSE The purpose of this manuscript is to present a method of temporary fecal diversion. METHODS A tube was sutured into the anorectum of eight patients with large infected and/or necrotic perianal lesions that were being soiled and infected by the fecal stream. Five patients were diabetic, two had sacral pressure sores, and one suffered from hidradenitis suppurativa. RESULTS Tubes remai...

متن کامل

Temporary transverse colostomy vs loop ileostomy in diversion: a case-matched study.

HYPOTHESIS For temporary fecal diversion, transverse colostomy (TC) has superior safety, but loop ileostomy (LI) has superior management qualities. METHODS Of patients with TC or LI seen between 1988 and 1997, 63 patients were matched for diagnosis, operative procedure, and date of surgery. The 2 groups were then compared for hospital/postoperative mortality and morbidity and stoma complicati...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES

دوره 17 2  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2011